"When I began doing wavefront research in the late 1980s, I realised that refractive surgery was increasing the aberrations of the eye and was causing a loss of best-corrected acuity... We used to not pay much attention to higher order aberrations because we couldn’t fix them." - Raymond Applegate, OD, PhD. Source: EuroTimes June 2003
Do you have higher order aberrations after LASIK that negatively affect your quality of life? If so, the FDA wants to hear from you. File a MedWatch report with the FDA online. Alternatively, you may call FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 to report by telephone, download the paper form and either fax it to 1-800-FDA-0178 or mail it to the address shown at the bottom of page 3, or download the MedWatcher Mobile App for reporting LASIK problems to the FDA using a smart phone or tablet. Read a sample of LASIK injury reports currently on file with the FDA.
Patients with LASIK complications are invited to join the discussion on FaceBook
The image below-left shows a severe form of spherical aberration after LASIK (notice that the pedestrian is completely obscured by the starburst). Below-right is an image simulation of the eye chart generated from the corneal topography of a patient with higher order aberrations.
"Visual aberrations" or "optical aberrations" describe all imperfections of the eye's optical system that cause light rays to be improperly focused.
Lower order aberrations are simple defocus such as as myopia (nearsightedness), hyperopia (farsightedness), and astigmatism, which are correctable with glasses. Higher order aberrations (HOA) are more complex imperfections of the eye's optical system. Higher order aberrations are not correctable with glasses. Irregular corneal astigmatism creates higher order aberrations.
Higher order aberrations (HOA) are more complex forms of defocus. HOA are present in all human eyes, but in normal, unoperated eyes HOAs are so minor that they are barely noticeable if at all. The cutting of a LASIK flap and ablation of corneal tissue creates an unnatural, irregular shape of the cornea which increases the higher order aberrations of the eye. Symptoms of HOA include starbursts, halos, double vision, multiple images and smeared vision. The severity of induced HOAs depends on the profile of the LASIK flap, ablation profile, and the size of the patient's pupils. You can read more about pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK here.
If you are having problems with your vision after LASIK, your first step should be to get a new pair of glasses to see if it improves your vision. Often patients have "residual refractive error", even with the latest custom LASIK technology (so much for wavefront super human vision). If your vision problems are not corrected with glasses, you likely have higher order aberrations. Only hard contact lenses have the potential to correct higher order aberrations.
Higher order aberrations are measured with a wavefront aberrometer and expressed in terms that describe the shape and severity of the deviated light rays as they pass through the eye's optical system on the way to the retina. Coma, spherical aberration, and trefoil are the most common aberrations induced by LASIK. Coma causes light to be smeared like the tail of a comet in the night sky (see illustration below, top left). Double vision is a common symptom of coma. Spherical aberrations results when the pupil dilates larger than the area of the cornea that was fully corrected by the laser treatment, typically in dim light. Spherical aberration is associated with halos, starbursts, ghost images, and loss of contrast sensitivity (inability to see fine detail) in low light (see illustration of spherical aberrations below, top right). Trefoil causes a point of light to smear in three directions, like a Mercedes-Benz symbol (see illustration below, bottom left). It's quite common for a LASIK patient to have an increase in all of these aberrations (and others), resulting in distorted night vision when the pupil opens wide and allows light to enter through a larger area of the irregular corneal surface (see illustration below, bottom right).
Custom LASIK, also known as wavefront-guided LASIK, was introduced by the LASIK industry in the United States in 2003. Unlike conventional LASIK which is based solely on refraction (measurement of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism), 'custom' or 'wavefront-guided' LASIK is based on the total (lower and higher order) aberrations of the eye. A wavefront map is obtained prior to surgery which is used to program a custom treatment for each individual eye. Although the goal of wavefront-LASIK is to correct 'small optical imperfections' (HOAs), the procedure actually makes them worse than before surgery. The increase in HOAs is greater with conventional LASIK than with custom wavefront-guided LASIK. This really has little to nothing to do with the ability of custom-LASIK to treat preoperative aberrations -- it is due to removal of more tissue in the periphery of the cornea to account for loss of laser energy on the slope of the cornea (cosine effect). Wavefront-optimized LASIK attempts to maintain the cornea's original curvature shape by applying more laser energy in the periphery, but, like other forms of LASIK, it consistently leads to an increase in higher order aberrations. Read more: Link
From the FDA website: "Although wavefront-guided treatments attempt to eliminate higher order aberrations, results from the clinical studies have shown that the average aberrations still increase, but less than they do after conventional LASIK." Source
TAKE THE WAVEFRONT CHALLENGE! If you decide to go through with LASIK after reading this website, take the wavefront challenge. Get a copy of your preoperative wavefront map. (If you tell the surgeon why you want this map, he may not want to proceed with your surgery.) After surgery, ask for a post-op wavefront map taken at the same scan diameter as the pre-op map. Compare the higher order aberrations from pre-op to post-op. (This measurement is meaningless if the scan diameters are not identical). Did the higher order aberrations increase? Did your surgeon warn you that your custom-LASIK treatment would lead to an increase in visual distortions? Now do you believe us?
Was this information helpful? Use the contact form on the menu bar above to send us a message.
Medical studies about higher order aberrations after LASIK
Higher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with alcon and wavelight lasers: a prospective randomized trial.
J Refract Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):S799-803. Brint SF.
Brint Vision, Metairie, LA, USA. Brintmd@aol.com
PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences in higher order aberration outcomes between bilateral wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK treatments on two closely matched patient groups 1 and 3 months following surgery.
METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to undergo bilateral LASIK with either the Alcon CustomCornea laser system or the WaveLight Allegretto Wave laser system. Standard clinical outcomes such as visual acuity and manifest refraction were evaluated as well as quality of vision measures such as subjective questionnaires and higher order aberrations. All patients completed follow-up examinations for 3 months following surgery.
RESULTS: At 1 and 3 months after surgery, the uncorrected visual acuity and the refractive outcome were similar for the two laser platforms, with 90% to 93% eyes being within +/- 0.5 D of intended outcome. At 1 and 3 months the Alcon CustomCornea group had a statistically significant lower amount of induced total higher order aberrations compared to the Allegretto Wave group (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: LASIK for myopia with the Alcon CustomCornea and WaveLight Allegretto Wave systems is highly effective in terms of refractive outcome and uncorrected visual acuity. However, aberrations were statistically significantly greater after treatment with the WaveLight Allegretto Wave system than with the Alcon CustomCornea.
Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations.
Ophthalmology. 2004 Dec;111(12):2175-85. Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kühne C, Mirshahi A.
Department of Ophthalmology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. firstname.lastname@example.org
OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and change in aberrations after wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, self-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Wavefront-guided LASIK was performed in 97 eyes in a 1-year trial. Treated eyes had a mean subjective manifest spherical equivalent (SE) of -5.22+/-2.07 diopters (D), with a range of -0.25 to -9.00 D of myopia and 0 to -3.25 D of astigmatism. I
NTERVENTION: After a microkeratome cut, a wavefront-based excimer ablation (Zyoptix 3.1) was performed. The full treatment to achieve emmetropia of an early nomogram provided by the system manufacturer was used in all procedures.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability were evaluated at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively. Wavefront changes of higher order aberrations (HOAs) at 1 year were determined for pupil sizes of 3.5 and 6 mm. RESULTS: At 1 year postoperatively, uncorrected visual acuity (VA) was 20/20 or better in 83% of the eyes, and 20/40 or better in 98%. The mean subjective manifest SE at 1 year was -0.25+/-0.43 D; it was within 0.50 D in 77% and within 1.0 D in 95%. No eye lost > or =2 lines of best spectacle-corrected VA (BSCVA) at 1 year postoperatively; 40 eyes gained 1 line of BSCVA, and 5 eyes gained 2 lines. The total HOA root mean square (RMS) increased on average by a factor of 1.23+/-0.57 with a 3.5-mm pupil; for the 6 mm pupil, the increase factor was 1.52+/-0.36. No change or reduction in the total HOA RMS was observed in 45.5% of the eyes for a 3.5-mm pupil and in 20.6% for a 6-mm pupil. There was a significant increase of primary spherical aberration (Z 4,0) by a factor of 4.11+/-10.17 for 3.5-mm pupils and 4.31+/-6.76 for 6-mm pupils.
CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK using Zyoptix 3.1 is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Although in close to half of the eyes HOAs could be reduced, there was still undercorrection and induction of HOAs with the algorithm employed.
Refractive surgery, optical aberrations, and visual performance.
J Refract Surg. 1997 May-Jun;13(3):295-9. Applegate RA, Howland HC.
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.
Visual optics is taking on new clinical significance. Given that current refractive procedures can and do induce large amounts of higher order ocular aberration that often affects the patient's daily visual function and quality of life, we can no longer relegate the considerations of ocular aberrations to academic discussions. Instead, we need to move toward minimizing (not increasing) the eye's aberrations at the same time we are correcting the eye's spherical and cylindrical refractive error. These are exciting times in refractive surgery, which need to be tempered by the fact that after all the research, clinical, and marketing dust settles, the level to which we improve the quality of the retinal image will be guided by the trade-off between cost and the improvement in the quality of life that refractive surgery offers.
Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
American Journal of Ophthalmology Volume 127, Issue 1 , January 1999, Pages 1-7
Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Howland HC, El Danasoury MA. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Japan. email@example.com
PURPOSE: To compare changes in the corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, 22 patients with bilateral myopia received photorefractive keratectomy on one eye and laser in situ keratomileusis on the other eye. The procedure assigned to each eye and the sequence of surgery for each patient were randomized. Corneal topography measurements were performed preoperatively, 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The data were used to calculate the wavefront aberrations of the cornea for both small (3-mm) and large (7-mm) pupils.
RESULTS: Both photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis significantly increased the total wavefront aberrations for 3- and 7-mm pupils, and values did not return to the preoperative level throughout the 12-month follow-up period. For a 3-mm pupil, there was no statistically significant difference between photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis at any postoperative point. For a 7-mm pupil, the post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes exhibited significantly larger total aberrations than the post-photorefractive keratectomy eyes, where a significant intergroup difference was observed for spherical-like aberration, but not for coma-like aberration. This discrepancy seemed to be attributable to the smaller transition zone of the laser ablation in the laser in situ keratomileusis procedure. Before surgery, simulated pupillary dilation from 3 to 7 mm caused a five- to six-fold increase in the total aberrations. After surgery, the same dilation resulted in a 25- to 32-fold increase in the photorefractive keratectomy group and a 28- to 46-fold increase in the laser in situ keratomileusis group. For a 3-mm pupil, the proportion of coma-like aberration increased after both photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. For a 7-mm pupil, coma-like aberration was dominant before surgery, but spherical-like aberration became dominant postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis increase the wavefront aberrations of the cornea and change the relative contribution of coma- and spherical-like aberrations. For a large pupil, laser in situ keratomileusis induces more spherical aberrations than photorefractive keratectomy. This finding could be attributable to the smaller transition zone of the laser ablation in the laser in situ keratomileusis procedure.
Disclaimer: The information contained on this web site is presented for the purpose of warning people about LASIK complications prior to surgery. LASIK patients experiencing problems should seek the advice of a physician.